Portfolio Scoring Sheet for Evaluators
  1. Does not meet expectations
  2. Occasionally meets expectations
  3. Meets expectations
  4. Exceeds expectations
  5. Greatly exceeds expectations

URL: http://www.students.niu.edu/~Z160357/ENGL103E04/home.html
Student ID    1 Rater ____________

Outcome

Goal addressed effectively in reflection

Evidence of outcome in portfolio

Identifies and responds to needs of different audiences and rhetorical situations through voice, tone, and level of formality. Reflection Score (1-5) Evidence Score (1-5)
Uses convention of format and structure appropriate to the rhetorical situation. Reflection Score (1-5) Evidence Score (1-5)
Demonstrates the ability of the writer to invent, articulate, and understand the writer's own ideas as they relate to those of others. Reflection Score (1-5) Evidence Score (1-5)
Questions or analyzes the rhetorical appeals of written, graphic, or multi-media discourse. Reflection Score (1-5) Evidence Score (1-5)
Demonstrates strategies for pre-writing and drafting. Reflection Score (1-5) Evidence Score (1-5)
Demonstrates strategies for revising, editing, and proofreading, & demonstrates successful incorporation of peer and instructor feedback. Reflection Score (1-5) Evidence Score (1-5)
Shows control of features such as syntax, grammar, punctuation, and spelling? Reflection Score (1-5) Evidence Score (1-5)
Demonstrates effective and appropriate use of technology (e.g., in the creation and publication of the portfolio). Reflection Score (1-5) Evidence Score (1-5)
Holistic Impression Reflection Score (1-6) Evidence Score (1-6)
Strengths (check those that apply)
Audience Voice Representation Focus Genre Presentation
Weaknesses (check those that apply)
Audience Voice Representation Focus Genre Presentation
Final Qualitative Comment: Are there any features of this portfolio, either in terms of primary evidence or reflections, that should be noted, but that the above questions do not address? If so, please explain here.