Portfolio Scoring Sheet for Evaluators
1. Does not meet expectations
2. Occasionally meets expectations
3. Meets expectations
4. Exceeds expectations
5. Greatly exceeds expectations
URL: URL would be here
Student ID 34
Rater ____________
Outcome
Goal addressed effectively in reflection
Evidence of outcome in portfolio
Identifies and responds to needs of different audiences and rhetorical
situations through voice, tone, and level of formality.
Reflection Score (1-5)
Evidence Score (1-5)
Uses convention of format and structure appropriate to the rhetorical
situation. Reflection Score (1-5)
Evidence Score (1-5)
Demonstrates the ability of the writer to invent, articulate, and
understand the writer's own ideas as they relate to those of
others. Reflection Score
(1-5) Evidence Score
(1-5)
Questions or analyzes the rhetorical appeals of written, graphic, or
multi-media discourse. Reflection Score
(1-5) Evidence Score
(1-5)
Demonstrates strategies for pre-writing and drafting.
Reflection Score (1-5)
Evidence Score (1-5)
Demonstrates strategies for revising, editing, and proofreading, &
demonstrates successful incorporation of peer and instructor
feedback. Reflection Score (1-5)
Evidence Score (1-5)
Shows control of features such as syntax, grammar,
punctuation, and spelling?
Reflection Score (1-5)
Evidence Score (1-5)
Demonstrates effective and appropriate use of technology (e.g., in the
creation and publication of the portfolio).
Reflection Score (1-5)
Evidence Score (1-5)
Holistic Impression Reflection
Score (1-6) Evidence
Score (1-6)
Strengths (check those that apply)
Audience Voice
Representation Focus
Genre PresentationWeaknesses (check those that
apply)
Audience Voice
Representation Focus
Genre Presentation
Final Qualitative Comment: Are there any features of this portfolio,
either in terms of primary evidence or reflections, that should be
noted, but that the above questions do not address? If so, please
explain here.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submit