Volume 33, Number 1                  Spring 1999
Style Home

Current Issue

Subscription Information

Submission Information

Archives

Editorial Staff

Advisory Board

Back Issue Order Form

English Department at NIU

Northern Illinois University

Paul Hernadi and Francis F. Steen
“The Tropical Landscapes of Proverbia: A Crossdisciplinary Travelogue.” / 1

Michael Simpson
“Coleridge’s Swinging Moods and the Revision of ‘This Lime-Tree Bower My Prision’” / 20

John Knapp
“The Spirit of Classical Hymn in Shelley’s ‘Hymn to Intellectual Beauty’” / 43

Renee Tursi
“William James’s Narrative of Habit” / 67

Eric S. Neel
“The Talking Being Listening: Gertrude Stein’s ‘Patriarchal Poetry’ and the Sound of Reading / 88

Jo-Anne Cappeluti
“The Caliban Beneath the Skin: Abstract Drama in Auden’s Favorite Poem” / 107

Kerry McSweeney
“Literary Allusion adn the Poetry of Seamus Heaney” / 130

Rita Ferrari
“‘Where the Maps Stopped’: The Aesthetics of Borders in Louise Erdrich’s Love Medicine and Tracks” / 144 

Paul Hernadi and Francis F. Steen, “The Tropical Landscapes of Proverbia: A Crossdisciplinary Travelogue.” / 1
Proverbs are brief, memorable, and intuitively convincing formulations of socially sanctioned advice. Virtually all cultures possess a repertoire of such formulations grounded in accumulated experience. Why has the quintessentially oral genre of proverbs remained popular in literate and even postliterate societies? By bridging current gaps between literary and folklore studies and between rhetorical theory and cognitive science, we attribute the staying power of proverbs in individual minds and social circulation to such prosodic, grammatical, and semantic features of memorability as alliteration and rhyme, childlike repetitive syntax, and analogical troping across different conceptual domains. We also note that by lending communal approval to individual dispositions toward recurrent situations, proverbs help to allay any sense of guilt, shame, or regret that humans often experience as a result of their facing a bewildering plurality of behavioral options.
back to top

Michael Simpson, “Coleridge’s Swinging Moods and the Revision of ‘This Lime-Tree Bower My Prision’” / 20
Like most of Coleridge’s major poem, “This Lime-Tree Bower My Prison” was constituted by a substantial number of drafts and revisions. These revision, moreover, seem to have been motivated by multiple factors. Certain revisions of this poem in particular are conditioned on the one hand by Coleridge’s quarrel and reconciliation with Southey over the issue of the pantisocratic endeavor, and, on the other, by the documented shift in his philosophical allegiances from an affiliation with Hartley to a more Kantian orientation. “This Lime-Tree Bower My Prison” seeks to vindicate the Kantian model of an active mind by using it to explain both the rapprochement with Southey and the resulting revisions of the poem itself. This proving the efficacy of the Kantian mind, the poem can complete the reconciliation with Southey by proposing that this mind has established the previously aborted pantisocracy in a lime-tree bower. What the poem does not do, however, is share this active mind with its audience. As long-lost friend, but more particularly as the editor of the anthology in which the poem was first published, Southey is permitted no reciprocity, since the poem has already rationalized the loss and regaining of the friendship and has editorially revised itself. Southey is thus preempted, as are those recent editorial commentators on the text’s genesis.
back to top

John Knapp, “The Spirit of Classical Hymn in Shelley’s ‘Hymn to Intellectual Beauty’” / 43
Shelley’s “Hymn to Intellectual Beauty,” which modern critics of Shelley regard as an ode or, at best, a “Satanic” hymn, is in dialogue with the classical hymn and includes many features that link it to that genre. In the manner of the Homeric Hymns and the hymns of Callimachus, Cleanthes, and Julian, Shelley’s “Hymn” follows a tripartite sequence of exordium, exposition, and peroration, and reckons with fundamental separateness while aspiring to unity. The dialectic of containment and effusion that recent Shelley critics recognize operating in language itself is taken up generically by Shelley, vis-à-vis classical hymn, and indicates his sophisticated understanding of the mutability, rather than the inertness, of genre. Generic, formal, and stylistic consistencies bear on meaning in Shelley’s poetry, as the “Hymn” illustrates, and they make invaluable contributions to Shelley studies by increasing the coherence of works that might otherwise remain enigmatic and indeterminate.
back to top

Renee Tursi, “William James’s Narrative of Habit” / 67
In recovering from a mental and moral crisis that he described as an “ontological wonder-sickness,” William James discovered in the ideas of habit a language with which to express his restored creative energy. The narrative of habit that subsequently infuses his work contributes integrally to his thinking on the processive self and challenges assumptions about habit’s aesthetic force. Unlike Josiah Royce, who saw our daily mental negotiation of sense experience as the “destruction of possibility,” James believed we have “reproductive power” stored in habit, a startling notion when considered creatively, especially in view of Walter Pater’s 1888 credo that we fail creatively by forming habits. Echoing the empiricists and the pragmatic view, James’s narrative illustrates how habit banishes our experiential uncanniness by making our thoughts feel “at home,” thereby steeping our epistemological process indelibly in moral hues. Ultimately, as we see in his metaphysical inquiries especially, James has created a poetics of habit.
back to top

Eric S. Neel, “The Talking Being Listening: Gertrude Stein’s ‘Patriarchal Poetry’ and the Sound of Reading / 88
This article considers the sound of Gertrude Stein’s “Patriarchal Poetry” as a complex accompaniment to its script. Paying particular attention to the interpretive challenges and possibilities of reading aloud, the paper engages the sound and rhythm of the long prose poem as a supplement that simultaneously reinforces and exceeds the anti-patriarchal logic of its argument. The paper listens to Stein’s language for the phonotext which resonates with meaning’s excess. In addition, it argues that a reader’s vocalization of the piece constitutes a collaborative alternative to conventional vocabularies of interpretation and identity. Confronting the difficulty of Stein’s dense, repetitive passages, I suggest that readers have a responsibility to sound them out in order to generate the text’s music, and I conclude by arguing that this music is the evidence of possibilities outside the conventional vocabulary of inter-subjectivity.
back to top

Jo-Anne Cappeluti, “The Caliban Beneath the Skin: Abstract Drama in Auden’s Favorite Poem” / 107
This argument views the dog-skin’s soliloquy in W. H. Auden’s collaboration with Christopher Isherwood: The Dog Beneath the Skin, or Where is Francis? as a precursor of Auden’s favorite poem, “Caliban to the Audience,” the last section of The Sea and The Mirror. Studying this connection as an illustration of what Auden incorporates from drama into poetry reveals the way in which Auden incorporates abstract drama (the drama of ideas) into a prose poem. That is, from his dog-skin soliloquy, he learns how to use the dog-skin, and subsequently Caliban, as an actor/mouthpiece for the imagination. Both are inarticulate entities to which Auden gives speech, dramatizing through them the off-stage process of the imagination addressing the self by echoing the self. The argument thus delineates the aesthetic strategy of Auden’s stylistics in dramatizing the making activity of the imagination, of using himself as a poet to make poetry out of what he names in his 1956 essay, “Hic et Ille,” his “ripostes to his reflection” in the mirror. A final discussion argues the benefits of reading Caliban’s address in light of Auden’s aesthetic strategies, over and against the benefits of readings that attempt to use Auden’s life to explain this complicated piece of art.
back to top

Kerry McSweeney, “Literary Allusion adn the Poetry of Seamus Heaney” / 130
Recent critcal and theoretical work has brought into sharper focus the device of literary allusion as distinguished from echo, quotation, reinscription, and intertextuality in the involuntary sense. The poetry of Seamus Heaney, who makes frequent use of the device, is an excellent place to consider critical questions relating to its function in lyric poems: the means of control of the intertextual dynamics triggered by an allusion; the fact that an allusion necessarily intoduces a reflexive or meta-element into a poem; the relationship between a reader’s catching the allusion and the allusion’s effectiveness; and the critic’s responsibility if an allusion is perceived to weaken rather than strengthen a poem. “The Ministry of Fear,” “Holding Course,” “The Guttural Muse,” and the last of the “Glanmore Sonnets” are discussed in detail. The last contains Heaney’s most complexly successful literary allusion—a whole-to-whole intertextual relationship in which both the antecedent text and the alluding text are illuminated.
back to top

Rita Ferrari, “‘Where the Maps Stopped’: The Aesthetics of Borders in Louise Erdrich’s Love Medicine and Tracks” / 144
In her novels about Native American characters confined within and defined by the borders of a reservation and the boundaries of ethnic definition, Louise Erdrich uses the concept of the border as metaphor and narrative strategy for a newly imagined negotiation of individual and cultural identity. Writing about characters who are displaced by definition, Erdrich uses aesthetic displacement to critique any master narrative or totalizing viewpoint. Her negotiation of borders in her novels is a way not only of redrawing the boundaries of cultural representation, but of making the idea and image of the border or boundary problematic. This essay examines the problem of representation in Love Medicine and Tracks as it is illuminated through actual and metaphorical borders. It focuses on the various inflections of the relation between inside and outside as these inflections reveal the relation of self to other and of both to language.
back to top