Volume 35, Number 1                  Spring 2001
Style Home

Current Issue

Subscription Information

Submission Information

Archives

Editorial Staff

Advisory Board

Back Issue Order Form

English Department at NIU

Northern Illinois University

Michael Everton 
Critical Thumbprints in Arcadia: Renaissance Pastoral and the Process of Critique

Joe Bray 
The Source of “Dramatized Consciousness”: Richardson, Austen, and Stylistic Influence

Brett Zimmerman 
Frantic Forensic Oratory: Poe’s “The Tell-Tale Heart” 

Scott A. Kemp 
“They But Reflect the Things”: Style and Rhetorical Purpose in Melville's “The Piazza Tale”

Philip G. Hadlock 
The Light Continent: On Melancholia and Masculinity in Maupassant’s “Lui?” and “Une famille” 

Gerald Doherty 
Upright Man/Fallen Woman: Indentification and Desire in James Joyce’s “A Painful Case”

James Bloom 
The Occidental Tourist: The Counter-Orientalist Gaze in Fitzgerald’s Last Novels 

James J. Paxson 
Revisiting the Deconstruction of Narratology: Master Tropes of Narrative Embedding and Symmetry

Bruno Zerweck
Historicizing Unreliable Narration: Unreliability and Cultural Discourse  in Narrative Fiction 

Michael Everton, “Critical Thumbprints in Arcadia: Renaissance Pastoral and the Process of Critique” 
Arguing that the pastoral is best understood via its critical and revisionary nature, “Critical Thumbprints in Arcadia: Renaissance Pastoral and the Process of Critique” builds on the work of Harry Berger, Louis Montrose, and Raymond Williams to shed new light on the shared mechanics of pastoralism and its literary criticism and theory. The essay dissects the appropriation of antipastoral discourse by revisionary pastorals and then indicates the ways in which this appropriation is further complicated by contemporary theories of pastoralism. In other words, the argument explores how contemporary critics of pastoralism participate in a “culture” of critique by productively mimicking the critical methodologies of Renaissance pastoralists and antipastoralists like Christopher Marlowe, Sir Walter Raleigh, and Sir Philip Sidney, and thus provides a fundamental illustration of the familiar post-structuralist mantra that the critic is almost incomprehensibly implicated in that which he/she critiques. 
back to top

Joe Bray, “The Source of ‘Dramatized Consciousness’: Richardson, Austen, and Stylistic Influence” 
This essay searches for the roots of a stylistic technique that is of great importance in the history of the novel. Though “dramatized consciousness” (to use F. R. Leavis’s term) has often been regarded in English literary history as the creation of Jane Austen, it is possible to trace the style at least back into the eighteenth century. The source under investigation here is the epistolary novel, a genre rarely examined for this technique, perhaps because of its first-person form. Yet the way that first-person narrators dramatize their own past consciousness bears comparison with the way that third-person narrators represent the thoughts of characters. This essay focuses particularly on The History of Sir Charles Grandison (1753-54), Samuel Richardson’s third epistolary novel, and the way the past thought-processes of its heroine, Harriet Byron, are re-enacted in her present writing. Similarities with the representation of Elizabeth Bennet’s and Emma Woodhouse’s consciousness establish the stylistic influence of Grandison on Austen. 
back to top

Brett Zimmerman, “Frantic Forensic Oratory: Poe’s ‘The Tell-Tale Heart’”
“The Tell-Tale Heart,” while usually read as a confession, can be seen more accurately as a defense—a specimen of forensic oratory. The narrator employs four of the six parts of a classical speech. His exordium (introduction) attempts to condition the audience through praeparatio and a friendly concession (paromologia) as part of his ethical appeal (eunoia). The second part, the narratio (statement of the case), features the defendant’s explanation of the events and their causes through expeditio, aetiologia, and necessum. He skips the third part of the classical speech (divisio) but combines the traditional fourth and fifth parts (confirmatio, refutatio), and a central device of this section is paradiastole, the narrator’s revaluation of values—a sure sign of his schizophrenic split between thought and feeling. Poe presents a fascinating but pathetic spectacle, a “jarring collocation”: insanity employing principally the Aristotelian rhetorical appeal to logos (reason) within a classical framework. 
back to top

Scott A. Kemp, “‘They But Reflect the Things’: Style and Rhetorical Purpose in Melville’s ‘The Piazza Tale’” 
Absent among the major studies of Melville’s short fiction is discussion of his style at it relates to his larger rhetorical choices during the writing of his serialized fiction, 1853-56. If style as a rhetorical choice is central to Mardi, Moby-Dick, and Pierre, then it is worth examining during Melville’s tenure as a serial writer between 1853 and 1856. As arguably the most stylistically embellished tale in the  Melville ouevre, “The Piazza Tale” is exemplary for analysis. By analyzing the stylistic techniques in this tale, we may better appreciate how the syntactical components in Melville’s sentences reinforce how he establishes character tension and subverts the narrative voice. Ultimately, the story illustrates the breakdown of community as the sailor-narrator chooses to maintain a literal and psychological perspective that does not fully account for the reality around him, including Marianna, the “damsel whom he visits in the tale. 
back to top

Philip G. Hadlock, “The Light Continent: On Melancholia and Masculinity in Maupassant’s ‘Lui?’ and ‘Une famille’” 
At least since the time of Freud, critical and literary theorists have reflected on the question of the “riddle” of femininity. One of the primary consequences of these reflections has consisted in positing the feminine as a fundamental expression of alterity. In a reading of two tales by Guy de Maupassant, this essay considers the connotations of this scenario for the masculine. The masculine, which has frequently served as a clear and constant foil to the feminine’s otherness, emerges in Maupassant’s typology as an expression of an aporia central to “phallocentric” culture: the semiotic primacy of the masculine transcends the primal moment in which the patriarchal phallus becomes central to signification through its very obscurity. This moment, most cogently articulated in the myth of the drunken, naked Noah covered by his sons, predicates the meaning of the masculine upon an undisclosable melancholia. 
back to top

Gerald Doherty, “Upright Man/Fallen Woman: Identification and Desire in James Joyce’s ‘A Painful Case’”
This interpretation of James Joyce’s “A Painful Case” weaves together three disparate strands to demonstrate how intimately they mesh with each other: a tropological strand, which structures the plot around three major metaphorical matrices (ascent/descent/alimentation): a psychoanalytical one, which uncovers the maimed psychical dispositions that underwrite each of these matrices: and a colonial one, which reveals the larger socio-political forces that generate these maiming-effects. 
back to top

James Bloom, “The Occidental Tourist: The Counter-Orientalist Gaze in Fitzgerald’s Last Novels” 
A memorable set-piece in Tender is the Night stages a face-off between the Occident and what used to be called the Orient, between “princely households, one of the East and one of the West,” on a provincial French “station platform.” This passage constitutes a climactic moment in Fitzgerald’s career-long effort to identify and anatomize his own “home” civilization. Remapping as a reflection of Fitzgerald’s career-long preoccupation with the constitution of civilizations became at once more far-reaching and more oblique in Fitzgerald’s later work. As a complement to well-established scholarly attention to Fitzgerald’s interest in Spengler and the implications of his work, my paper relies on two more recent and related heuristics: the counter Orientalist critique that Edward Said introduced to literary studies a generation ago and the concern with gaze that feminist critics have made a critical commonplace. With these twinned heuristics as my points of departure, this essay argues that in his two last sustained narratives, Tender and (with less emphasis) The Last Tycoon, Fitzgerald pushes his narrators and readers beyond a mutually and durably fantasized identity as “Westerners” in pursuit of a critically cosmopolitan, anti-ethnocentric perspective and thus against what we often continue to regard as the primacy and normative inevitability of “the West.” In articulating this critical cosmopolitanism, both novels in their entirety probe prevailing but limited and noxious understandings not only of what it means to “be civilized” but of what our constructions and demarcations of so-called “civilizations,” as Western or otherwise, entail. This essay examines how Fitzgerald conducts these explorations. 
back to top

James J. Paxson, “Revisiting the Deconstruction of Narratology: Master Tropes of Narrative Embedding and Symmetry”
Although significant studies on narrative embedding or framing (Jeffrey Williams’s Theory and the Novel; William Nelles’s Frameworks) have come to light in recent years, narratology can continue to benefit from a fuller analysis that exploits the rhetorical theory of deconstruction and of the classical history of rhetoric. I show how narrative embedding, that I christen in this study “para-antimetabole,” can be understood as a subset of the rhetorical tropes antimetabole and chiasmus—both of which involve syntactical structures that get reversed at a linear or syntagmatic midpoint. Using Johannes Kepler’s posthumously published allegory Somnium (1634)—a text about life on the moon—I then demonstrate how a frustrated desire for symmetry characterizes these mutually related devices, the poetic deployment of which can undo the formalist and structuralist impulses in conventional narratology. 
back to top

Bruno Zerweck, “Historicizing Unreliable Narration: Unreliability and Cultural Discourse in Narrative Fiction” 
The concept of “unreliable narration” cannot be adequately explained in terms of text-centered and synchronic models or with recourse to the concept of the implied author. Thus, the recently developed cognitive narratological approach to the phenomenon of unreliability  (which represents a first paradigm shift) has to be extended towards a historical “cultural narratology.” Such a second paradigm shift—a historical and cultural turn—goes beyond a synchronic and constructivist cognitive approach in the direction of a diachronic cultural-narratological theory of unreliable narration. The central thesis here rests upon the realization that, because unreliability is the effect of interpretive strategies, it is culturally and historically variable. It therefore reflects a number of prominent synchronic and diachronic developments within different cultural discourses. These discourses have at the same time “produced” and been influenced by the notion and the use of unreliable narration in narrative literature over the last two centuries. After a brief sketch of the cognitive turn and its implications for our understanding of what exactly constitutes unreliable narration, four theses highlight the central features and the minimal conditions of unreliable narration and point out the necessity of a historical and cultural turn in the study of narrative unreliability. They are followed by four diachronic theses that illustrate how a history of unreliable narration would look. 
back to top