Volume 37, Number 1            Spring 2003

Style Home

Current Issue

Subscription Information

Submission Information

Archives

Editorial Staff

Advisory Board

Back Issue Order Form

English Department at NIU

Northern Illinois University

Dan McIntyre
Using Foregrounding Theory as a Teaching Methodology in a Stylistics Course

Sonia Zyngier and Tania M. G. Shepherd
What is Literature, Really? A Corpus-Driven Study of Students’ Statements

Mick Short and Dawn Archer
Designing a Worldwide Web-Based Stylistics Course and Investigating it’s Effectiveness

Brett Zimmerman
Teaching Melville and Style: A Catalogue of Selected Rhetorical Devices

Lesley Jeffries
Analogy and Multi-modal Exploration in the Teaching of Language Theory

John Tinker
Vagrant Sympathies: From Stylistic Analysis to a Pedagogy of Style

Melina Bär
Checklist of American and British Programs in Stylistics and Literary Linguistics

John V. Knapp
Talking the Walk in Cognitive Stylistics

Dan McIntyre, “Using Foregrounding Theory as a Teaching Methodology in a Stylistics Course” 
In this article I suggest that foregrounding theory, arguably the cornerstone of stylistics, might be employed not only in the analysis of texts, but also as a methodology in teaching stylistic analysis.  I propose that effective and memorable lectures can be produced by deviating from the supposed prototypical lecture format, and that it is the resultant foregrounding effect that helps to give the lecture its memorable qualities.  In order to demonstrate how this might work I draw upon my own experiences of lecturing on a first year undergraduate course in stylistics (LING 131 Language and Style).  I discuss the reasoning behind the teaching methods used on the course as a means of showing how foregrounding elements of a lecture might result in a more effective learning experience for students.  I also explain how the effectiveness of LING 131 is due to its unique presentation of foregrounding via foregrounding.
back to top

Sonia Zyngier and Tania M.  G.  Shepherd.  “What is Literature, Really?  A Corpus-Driven Study of Students’ Statements” 
The purpose of the present study is to map the attitude of first-year university undergraduates regarding their conceptualization of literature.  To this end, we resort to the analytical tools defined by Martin and Martin and Rose, which describe the language of appraisal in English from a systemic functional perspective.  In order to establish a profile of students’ patterns of appraisal, a mini learner corpus of student essays was first collected and subsequently digitized.  The analysis was carried out by means of the computer software WordSmith Tools.  This software extracted concordance lines displaying the word literature in the node position.  Each concordance line was then manually labeled according to the analytical categories chosen for the present research.  The distribution of the various categories in the students’ texts suggests a utilitarian rather than an emotional stance towards literature. 
back to top

Mick Short and Dawn Archer.  “Designing a Worldwide Web-Based Stylistics Course and Investigating it’s Effectiveness” 
This article describes an interactive, “all singing and dancing” web-based version of an introductory stylistics course under development at Lancaster University, UK, as well as an educational experiment in which it will be used.  The web-based course is an electronic version of an existing lecture-seminar course that is designed to be interactive and fun, and also contains an innovative self-assessment mechanism which enables first-year students to practise stylistic analysis before submitting their coursework assessment at the end of the course.  The educational experiment involves using the two different teaching modes to deliver the course to parallel student groups, and comparing student reactions.  Colleagues in other universities are invited to join in the experiment, using students in their own departments.
back to top

Brett Zimmerman.  “Teaching Melville and Style: A Catalogue of Selected Rhetorical Devices” 
In 1995, with Melville our case study, I wanted to impress upon my senior English majors that style as well as theme is important in the literary productions of acknowledged masters.  My pedagogical introduction to stylistics would draw mostly upon the tropes and schemes of ancient Greek and Roman rhetors.  To increase my students’ sensitivity to Melville’s language, then, I distributed an alphabetical catalogue of rhetorical devices with definitions and exemplifications from his oeuvre—with mini-essays.  This catalogue supports Gail Coffler’s assertion that Melville was “an expert stylist” whose phrasing shows a clear understanding and intuitive mastery of classic principles.
back to top

Lesley Jeffries.  “Analogy and Multi-modal Exploration in the Teaching of Language Theory” 
This article reports on an experiment in teaching at Huddersfield University (UK) in the context of the first year of a single honors English Language degree program.  It took as its basic premise the idea that some kinds of learning of theory would be aided by the use of analogy explored by multi-modal means rather than the purely textual or discoursal.  This article combines the insights of research into analogical thinking and into multimodal cognition to suggest that analogical experimentation using exploratory methods with non-linguistic modes of representation may be able to help students in understanding and learning complex theoretical concepts.
back to top

John Tinker.  “Vagrant Sympathies: From Stylistic Analysis to a Pedagogy of Style” 
Several recent literary studies argue that style in language is an essential element in the formation of subcultures and subjectivities.  This article examines two of these studies and asks what their methods and findings suggest about the teaching of style in composition and rhetoric classes.  If style is instrumental to the coherence of localized cultures and to individuals’ understanding of themselves in language, as these literary studies suggest, an effective writing pedagogy will teach students to question the stylistic expectations of academic discourses, to respond to these expectations with a strategic balance of compliance and resistance, and to develop a large palette of stylistic options in order to understand how this feature of language shapes point of view.  The article concludes with questions about how new writing technologies may require us to think about style.
back to top

Melina Bär.  “Checklist of American and British Programs in Stylistics and Literary Linguistics”
The list of programs provided is meant to expedite the sometimes difficult process of finding a university at which to study stylistics or literary linguistics in the United States and the United Kingdom.  Most information is available online at the provided homepages or was generously supplied by the programs’ directors. 
back to top

John V.  Knapp.  “Talking the Walk in Cognitive Stylistics” 
Jonathan Culpeper has made a significant contribution to the study of literary character in drama by blending some basic characterological assumptions with what has come to be known as cognitive stylistics.  Culpeper asks three very large questions: (1.) How does the reader’s prior knowledge contribute to characterization?  (2.) How does the reader infer characteristics from the text?  (3.) What are the textual cues in characterization?  After a general discussion of what he calls “the process of character formation,” Culpeper examines earlier scholarship in text comprehension, work done largely in German, followed by his own “general model for characterization.” He then surveys character categories in previous literary criticism, followed by chapters analyzing the roles of “top-down” and “bottom-up” processing in inferring character from texts and textual cues in characterization.  Culpeper concludes his study with brief mentions of the play, The Entertainer and the film, Scent of a Woman, and follows up with a lengthier study of Shakespeare’s Taming of the Shrew to illustrate the insights derived from his cognitive and linguistic labors.
back to top