|
William L. Davis, “Structural Secrets: Shakespeare’s
Complex Chiasmus” / 237
This essay examines the presence and stylistic development of Shakespeare’s
large-scale, biblical chiastic structures. These intricate schemes,
built using a combination of classical rhetorical principles and complex
biblical patterns, appear in a wide range of structural variations and
play an important role in Shakespeare’s approach to composition.
back to top
Marcia Macaulay, “When Chaos Is Come
Again: Narrative and Narrative Analysis in Othello” / 259
Shakespeare’s Othello has provoked extensive interpretive response
because at the heart of the play a man murders his wife in a state of jealousy
largely of his own creation, abetted by a villain whose own motives have
been queried. Three different interpretive positions have been taken
to explain how this murder is brought about in the play. Some critics
exonerate Othello of any blame, others see Iago as an honest realist, and
a third camp sees Othello and Iago as sharing responsibility as well as
aspects of personality. This essay examines the central role of narrative
as a speech act in the play. Narrative, in fact, provides what William
Labov calls the “complicating action” of the play, otherwise termed “the
seduction scene.” The characters in Othello engage in narrative construction
of themselves and others throughout the play. The play provides four
principal tellings of Othello’s wooing of Desdemona, including importantly
that of Desdemona herself. These narratives come into conflict as
the play unfolds, and in conflict they propel the story forward to the
ultimate betrayal of Desdemona by Othello himself.
back to top
Ira Clark, “The Trappings of All’s Well
That Ends Well” / 277
All’s Well That Ends Well belongs to a period of the London stage dominated
by problem plays that depend on trickery and reversals, most often sexual
trickery combined with familial, economic, and sociopolitical calculation,
played out for gain as contests of wit. All’s Well’s style too focuses
on witty proverbial language to sum up wisdom, stimulate thought, analyze
actors and actions, embody abundant intellectual and emotional energies,
and provide rhetorical display. The play’s characters predominantly and
repeatedly employ such language with other stylistic techniques such as
recurring image references, linguistic trappings, to challenge and counter-challenge
and ultimately entrap each other. Moreover Shakespeare replicates
and varies the dominant patterns of intrigue plotting notable in problem
plays by offering a series of reversals that constitute false temporary
endings before presenting the extensive climactic set of surprising and
revealing reversals that reaffirm his heroine’s extraordinary witty victory
in the battle of the sexes and society. This reading thus tries to
illustrate the importance of analyzing style for understanding the inseparably
intertwined narration and theme.
back to top
Maurice Hunt, “Shakespeare’s ‘Still-Vexed’
Tempest” / 299
Commentators on Shakespeare’s plays have shown how early modern rhetorical
figures, as described for example by George Puttenham in The Art of English
Poesie (1589), provide the paradigm for better understanding the values
of Titus Andronicus and Hamlet (synecdoche), King John (antimetabole),
and Coriolanus (a combination of metonymy and synecdoche). These
commentators have not shown, however, how a single phrase in a Shakespeare
play encapsulates a rhetorical trope that describes a signature experience
of that play. This is what I do for The Tempest. The phrase
in question is “still-vexed,” appearing in Ariel’s utterance “where once
/ Thou called’st me up at midnight to fetch dew / From the still-vexed
Bermudas” (1.2.229–31). This two-word phrase, once recognized as an oxymoron,
represents a primary dramatic effect of The Tempest. Analysis conducted
in terms of the oxymoronic paradigm “still-vexed” describes in a new way
the persistence of a dynamic in The Tempest that plays into and indirectly
makes possible the drama’s emphasis upon release from bondage.
back to top
Paul J. Hecht, “Spenser out of His Stanza”
/ 316
The eclogues in couplets in The Shepheardes Calendar, which are metrically
“rougher” than other eclogues, display qualities crucial to the success
of The Faerie Queene, qualities that are absent of deficient in the stanzaic
eclogues. In the nonstanzaic poems we see irregular groups of lines and
speeches that have a sense of motion that is independent of meter or line
or rhyme scheme. Spenser’s poetic development from the Calendar might better
be regarded as a synthesis of techniques than as a selection of one kind
of poetry (in stanzas) over others.
back to top
Jennifer McKellar, “The Poetics of Interruption
in Mark Twain’s Roughing It” / 336
By adapting the techniques of digression and hesitation that he used
in the lecture hall into a model for writing, Mark Twain crafts an interpolative
style that is almost instantly recognizable and that functions as a efficient
vehicle for both his humor and his serious commentary. Roughing It
is Twain’s most sustained effort at fashioning this distinctive style,
and thus deserves more serious attention in itself rather than simply by
virtue of its relevance to his other work. While some critics have
noted Twain’s handling of language as a dismissal of “conventional narrative
logic,” none has proposed that Twain substitutes an alternative logic or
structure. Instead, they seem content to characterize the novel as
adopting a “looser attitude” toward structure. Examining Twain’s
techniques of interruption, I propose that these techniques constitute
a pervasive formal structure to which the text carefully adheres, a structure
that not merely overlays a loose narrative structure but rather supplants
narrative structure altogether.
back to top
Yinglin Ji and Dan Shen, “Transitivity, Indirection,
and Redemption: Sheila Watson’s The Double Hook” / 348
While stylistics in various forms has been flourishing in Britain over
the past forty years or so, its development has been rather limited in
America since the late 1970s. One of the major reasons underlying American
scholars’ neglect of stylistics is that they tend to hold stylistic analysis
to be “circular,”that is not able to offer fresh interpretations of literary
texts. The present study aims at demonstrating the usefulness and even
indispensability of stylistics by analyzing the hidden and neglected relation
between transitivity patterning, indirect presentation, and the theme of
redemption in Sheila Watson’s The Double Hook. It is revealed that, in
connection with the theme of redemption, the authorial narrator purposefully
presents the protagonist in a particular way through ingenious linguistic
choices. The stylistic revelation may not only shed fresh light on the
protagonist’s character, but also alter the understanding of plot progression,
thereby helping resolve relevant critical controversy. Further, it is shown
that the transitivity model greatly facilitates a systematic analysis of
the writer’s indirect way of presentation, especially when such indirection
constitutes a general stylistic strategy of the text.
back to top
|
|