|
Geoffrey Leech, “Style in Fiction
Revisited: the Beginning of Great Expectations” / 117
The first half of this introductory essay illustrates, with reference
to the five subsequent articles in this issue of Style, how topics presented
in SIF (Leech and Short, Style in Fiction: An Introduction to English Fictional
Prose) have been explored in new and fruitful ways since its original publication
in 1981. The second half examines the opening of Chapter 1 of Dickens’
Great Expectations, in particular the third paragraph, providing an example
of the practical stylistic analysis of short prose passages, typical of
SIF, and showing the interconnections between the main topics to be elaborated
in this issue.
back to
top
Barbara Dancygier, “Narrative Anchors
and the Processes of Story Construction: the Case of Margaret Atwood’s
The Blind Assassin”/ 133
This paper extends the analytic tools developed within blending theory,
to propose a new approach to the narrative as a cognitive construct. Specifically,
the paper introduces the concept of narrative anchors, defined as textual
devices prompting the emergence of narrative spaces. It is argued that
a renewed interest in text analysis might provide a link between the local
level stylistic choices and the global level construct known as “the story.”
Within this framework, stories can be seen as complex blends, emerging
from subsequent levels of integration of narrative spaces.
back to
top
Elena Semino, “Mind Style Twenty-five Years On”
/ 153
In this article I show how work on mind style over the last 25 years
has built on the account provided by Leech and Short in Style in Fiction.
I begin by pointing out the central role of “fictional minds” in current
work in narratology. In particular, I endorse the claim, made by many scholars,
that fictional minds are primarily (although not exclusively) constructed
on the basis of what we know about “real” minds, and can be usefully analysed
by means of models developed by cognitive psychologists and cognitive scientists.
I then consider the contributions of cognitive theories such as Schema
theory and Cognitive Metaphor theory, and of theories from pragmatics such
as Grice’s Cooperative Principle and Politeness theory. I finish by considering
the use of corpus-linguistic techniques to investigate the systematic linguistic
patterns that can be responsible for the projection of mind style.
back to
top
David Hoover, “Corpus Stylistics, Stylometry,
and the Styles of Henry James” / 174
Stylometry provides powerful techniques for examining authorial style
variation. This study uses several such techniques to explore the traditional
distinction between James’s early and late styles. They confirm this distinction,
identify an intermediate style, and facilitate an analysis of the lexical
character of James’s style. Especially revealing are techniques that identify
words with extremely variable frequencies across James’s oeuvre–words that
clearly characterize the various period styles. Such words disproportionately
increase or decrease steadily throughout James’s remarkably unidirectional
stylistic development. Stylometric techniques constitute a promising avenue
of research that exploits the power of corpus analysis and returns our
attention to a manageable subset of an author’s vocabulary.
back to
top
Catherine Emmott, Anthony J.
Sanford, and Eugene J. Dawydiak, “Stylistics Meets Cognitive Science: Studying
Style in Fiction and Readers’ Attention from an Interdisciplinary Perspective”
/ 204
Readers’ attention has been studied in stylistics using notions such
as foregrounding (MukaÍovský) and psychological prominence
(Leech and Short). In this article, we offer a fresh perspective on this
topic from Cognitive Science. Our research draws on the psychological framework
of “depth of processing” (e.g. Sanford and Sturt), which provides a context
for studying different degrees of attention during reading. We identify
stylistic features and narratological cues in fiction which we intuitively
feel to be “attention-capturing devices.” We then use a new psycholinguistic
technique, the text-change detection method (Sturt et al.), to test whether
the stylistic features we have selected really do make readers more attentive,
in the sense of making them more alert to textual detail.
back to
top
Mick Short, “Thought Presentation Twenty-five
Years On” / 227
In this article, I briefly describe the Style in Fiction approach to
discourse presentation, including thought presentation and how it has developed
since 1981 via the Lancaster Speech, Writing and Thought Presentation (SW&TP)
project. I then go on to suggest how the various findings we have arrived
at have affected our view of thought presentation and how it needs to be
described and explained. Finally, I explore some unresolved issues in relation
to thought presentation categories at the narrator-dominated end of the
thought presentation scale.
back to
top |
|