Designing Short Assignments: SON Workshop
I. Efficiency Analysis of Assignments
Learning develops best in courses where writing accounts for
at least 25% of the final grade. Some revision is crucial. But written coursework is more efficient if
you:
·
Assign shorter, multiple writing tasks instead of a lengthy
formal paper
·
Include intermittent, brief, informal writing exercises that
“feed into” formal assignments
·
Design assignments that give detailed information on what
you expect
·
Provide models of what a successful assignment should look
like
·
Devote class time to get students started
·
Require students to submit work at an early stage (e.g., a
prospectus, abstract, research question plus thesis)
·
Provide specific written feedback on drafts (try boilerplate
and minimal marking; don’t line-edit!)
·
Create rubrics that echo the criteria—and use rubrics to
guide (1) advice-centered peer reviews or
(2) revision in lieu of written feedback
·
Hold group conferences
·
Assign collaborative papers
·
Provide whole-class response to common drafting problems
·
Give the Writing Center copies of the assignment and a model
paper—and tell students to make a timely appointment
·
Put minimal comments on finished papers
Adapted from Bean, Engaging Ideas
The following two-part exercise is
one of nine Critical Thinking Exercises that first-semester nursing students
must answer. Each exercise accompanies the concept being studied that week:
1.
A 66 year-old male has been admitted to the nursing unit
with CHF (congestive heart failure).
The physician has ordered oxygen via nasal cannula at a flow rate of 6
L/min. You note that the client
continues to be restless, his pulse rate and respiratory rate are increased,
and he continues to breathe through his mouth.
He keeps pulling the cannula out, complaining that it’s uncomfortable
and stating that “no one can breathe with this in their nose”. What actions would you take? What is your
rationale?
2.
You are caring for a client one day post operatively
following abdominal surgery. On your
morning assessment, you obtain the following vital sign data: BP 142/80, pulse
84, respirations 12 and shallow, temperature 100.4° F. Pain is well controlled on PCA morphine,
breath sounds are diminished at the bases with a few crackles, O2 at 93 %.
Based on this information, what problems/or potential problems can you
identify? How will you individualize your plan of care for this client?
The following is a “model answer” to #2:
This patient’s systolic BP is slightly high, her pulse is
normal, her temperature is at the high end of normal, but the thing that
strikes my immediate attention is her shallow respiration rate of 12 breaths
per minute, also the patient’s diminished breath sounds at the base, crackles,
and relatively low O2 saturation. These assessments would all raise the
question; is this patient receiving enough oxygen? The main problem right now
would be impaired gas exchange that has the potential to progress and worsen
the client’s condition. She seems to be having a deficit of oxygenation. My
main concern in developing a care plan for this patient would be to improve her
gas exchange, therefore improving her respiration depth and oxygen saturation.
Since this person is recovering from abdominal surgery her abdominal muscles
are most likely weak therefore making her ability to take deep breaths more
difficult than usual. Therefore I might have her sit up and support her stomach
with a pillow and have her take some deep breaths, if she can tolerate it. I
would also pay close attention to the patient’s crackles and slightly elevated
temperature, as these could be early signs of pneumonia. This could lead to a
more serious problem with impaired gas exchange. If the patient produced any
sputum I would evaluate it, and/or send it to the lab to be tested. If the
client’s fever got any higher I would also order a chest x-ray. But my action
as for right now would be to raise the bed to allow for complete lung
expansion, encourage deep breathing while supporting her abdomen, and
encouraging her to cough and release some sputum that is causing the crackles
in her lungs. Also, since she is on a PCA morphine this narcotic could be
contributing to her shallow, slow respiration rate. I would get an order to
take her off of the PCA and get pain medication administered orally, so that I
could see if her respiration rate went back up after the drug was stopped for a
little. I would still be concerned with keeping this woman’s pain at a
manageable level and administering pain medication as it was needed. Depending
on the results of the above actions I would move on from there in developing a
more appropriate, focused care plan. (386 words)
Workshop Questions:
1.
What features of this assignment seem especially helpful to
the student?
2.
How could the professor cut the paper load for this
assignment?
3.
How might the assignment be changed to make feedback—or
perhaps revision—easier?
4.
What instructional uses might the “model answer” serve?
5.
What kinds of reflection might be added to this exercise?
6.
How could the “Nine Critical Thinking Exercises” be shaped
into a portfolio submission?
PATIENT PROFILE
DATABASE: Refer to pg.
21 in the Schuster book on Concept Mapping. Every patient must have the
laboratory data included on p. 21 as well as: red blood cells, sodium, BUN,
creatinine, magnesium. Be sure to include all the laboratory data listed on
page 21 in the text.
Explain why your patient’s lab values/diagnostic tests are
abnormal. List the medication, classification and reason for the mediation.
Hand in drug cards only when passing medications.
NURSING
CARE PLAN: List all the major nursing diagnoses, nursing goal, nursing
interventions, nursing evaluation associated with the patient’s care. You need
to have at least on physical and one psychosocial nursing diagnosis.
Concept Map and Major Nursing Care Plan Rubric:
PATIENT DATA BASE 20
points__________
·
Data base is complete
·
Appropriate lab. data listed and explained
·
Appropriate diagnostics listed and explained
·
Medications and actions of drugs listed
CONCEPT MAP
20
points __________
·
Major concept identified
·
Appropriate relationship between concepts
·
Appropriate subconcepts identified
NURSING DIAGNOSES 10
points ____________
·
Stated correctly
·
Objective & subjective data
·
Individualized to patient
PATIENT OUTCOMES
5 points
___________
·
Goal identified
·
Patient oriented
·
Time frame
·
Measurable
NURSING INTERVENTIONS 15
points ___________
·
Thorough
·
Concise
·
Specific (what, when, where, how)
·
Prioritized
·
Individualized to patient
RATIONALE 15
points ___________
·
Rationale for each intervention
·
Thorough
EVALUATION 10
points _____________
·
Evaluates whether goals are achieved
·
Develop interventions, if necessary
·
Describe conclusion
SOURCES 2.5 points ____________
·
Includes sources in careplan
·
Include complete reference of source
FORMAT
2.5 points _____________
·
Neat, legible and staple
·
Follows format
Workshop Questions:
1.
What features of this assignment seem especially helpful to
the student?
2.
How feasibly could this assignment be converted into a
student-team project—and what would be the advantages/disadvantages of requiring
a collaborative paper?
3.
How representative of nursing practice would a collaborative
paper be?
4.
What changes would the professor need to make to turn this
assignment into a collaborative paper?
5.
How might the self-evaluation be revised and assigned so
that each student-team member demonstrated satisfactory completion of course
objectives and personal contributions to the project?
6.
What considerations would faculty have to make in accepting
a collaborative paper as a portfolio submission?
IV.
Example 3: Nursing Theorist
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to assist the student
to explore the initial steps of the theory and practice of nursing by examining
a nursing theorist.
Content:
1.
The student will select a nurse theorist. The instructor
must approve this choice as no more than two students can select the same
theorist.
2.
The student will write an outline of the literature
reviewed.
A.
The student will complete a search for information related
to the theorist.
B.
The student will read the information gathered.
C.
The student will organize the information collected.
3. The
student will develop a scholarly paper that includes the following sections:
A.
Introduction: Overview of the nurse theorist:
What were the contributions? Why is this theory of any value? What is the
significance of this theory?
B.
Background/Historical Perspective: Develop
the nurse theorist as a real person. Where was she raised? What are her
personal values? Where did this person attend school?
C. Theory: Define and explain
the nursing theory.
D. Summary: General overall
summary of the paper. Is this theory implemented in nursing practice today?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of this theory? As a result of this
literature review, what have you, the writer, realized? How can you implement
this in your current practice?
E. References: List all
references (minimum of three) that were cited within the paper in APA format.
General Guidelines:
For paper:
1.
Limit paper to five (5) pages of text (Title page and
reference do not count.)
2.
Follow APA guidelines with 1” margins and doubled spaced.
Staple paper in the upper left-hand corner.
For presentation:
1. Be creative as well as educational.
2.
Limit presentation to no more that 10 minutes.
Evaluation of Nursing Theorist Paper Evaluation:
Total Possible Points = 100
·
Introduction (15%) 15 points:
·
Background/ History of theorist (15%) 15 points:
·
Theory (25%) 20 points:
·
Summary (15%) 20%:
·
Format (15%) 15 points:
-APA Format
-Grammar and Spelling
-Structure
and Organization
Evaluation of Nursing Theorist Presentation:
·
Total Possible Points = 50
·
Clarity (20%) 10 points
·
Organization (20%) 10 points
·
Creativity (20%) 10 points
·
Information Shared (40%) 20 points
-Overview
of the Nurse Theorist (5 points)
-Theory
Explanation (7 points)
-Implementation
into your Practice (8 points)
Workshop Questions:
1.
What features of this assignment seem especially helpful to
the student?
2.
How practically could this assignment be turned into a
series of multiple short assignments—and what might be the advantages/
disadvantages?
3.
Where would revision strategically benefit the student most,
if this assignment were converted into a series of shorter ones?
4.
Would it be necessary for the theorist presentation to occur
after the project was completed? If not, why?
5.
How—and where—might peer review fit into this project?
6.
Why would—or wouldn’t—it be acceptable to submit a “split
up” paper to the portfolio? Or would it be acceptible only to submit a portion
(e.g., the summary)?
V.
Suggested Breakout Activity
Please put yourself into groups of 3-4. You may want to
choose to form groups of faculty who teach courses at the same level objectives
in the nursing program. Or you may want to group yourselves among those who
teach at different level objectives. Elect someone to keep notes and please do
the following:
1.
Consider a writing assignment you require in one of your
courses—an assignment that you feel you need to shorten in some way, or replace
with a shorter assignments or exercises.
2.
OR... if you teach a course where you do not
currently assign writing, consider how you might integrate informal writing
exercises that could help students maintain practice for writing tasks in other
courses.
3.
Talk about the impact writing tasks in your
classes might have
on program objectives
and the
nursing portfolio.
4.
When everyone in your group has finished
sharing ideas,
sum up at least three points
or questions
your group raised.
If time permits, it would be useful for a spokesperson in each
group to share the three points they felt were particularly important with the
rest of the workshop participants.